BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM
As abortion rights remain a hotly debated issue in the United States, voters in ten states recently had the opportunity to change reproductive freedoms at the state level. More than two years after the Supreme Court decided to overturn Roe v. Wade, which destroyed the federal right to abortion, states have pursued a variety of ways to either safeguard or limit access. With the stakes high, this year’s ballots produced a mix of victories and defeats for reproductive rights activists.
In a historic stride forward, voters in seven states approved initiatives to maintain or extend abortion rights, countering the tide of restrictive legislation that has emerged in recent years. At the same time, similar efforts to strengthen abortion rights in Florida, South Dakota, and Nebraska failed, demonstrating how deeply divided the country remains on the issue.
Wins for abortion rights in seven states
Abortion rights supporters celebrated victories in Missouri and Arizona, where voters approved proposals to entrench the right to abortion until fetal viability in their state constitutions. These modifications will have a tremendous impact, particularly in Missouri, where abortion is now illegal with no exceptions for rape or incest. By creating a constitutional right to abortion, both states want to avoid future legislation that would further restrict access.
“Abortion rights supporters are hopeful this will lead to a widespread increase in access to reproductive care,” as advocates noted following the passage of these measures in Missouri and Arizona.
Similarly, Colorado took a significant step by passing a bill that goes beyond simply safeguarding abortion rights. In addition to enshrining the right to abortion, the state’s amendment allows for public funding of abortions, which might increase access for low-income people by potentially paying for abortion services through Medicaid and state employee health insurance.
Maryland also approved a resolution to include reproductive rights in the state constitution. Abortion is already lawful in Maryland with no gestational limit, but the legislation strengthens these rights, particularly as the state has become a hub for patients from neighboring states with tougher regulations. Maryland also passed a “shield law” in 2023 to protect abortion providers from investigations conducted by other states, demonstrating its dedication to reproductive rights.
In New York, voters passed an addition to the state’s equal protection provision that specifically provides safeguards for “pregnancy, pregnancy outcomes, and reproductive healthcare and autonomy.” This amendment not only protects abortion rights, but also prohibits discrimination based on age, sexual orientation, or gender identity.
Montana has joined these states in promoting reproductive rights. Voters confirmed the 1999 Montana Supreme Court verdict that protected abortion under the state’s right to privacy when they approved a proposition to protect the freedom to make pregnancy-related decisions up to fetal viability. With Montana Republican Governor Greg Gianforte challenging this precedent, the vote ensures abortion access despite efforts to restrict it.
Measures rejected in Florida, South Dakota, and Nebraska
Despite these advancements, attempts to protect abortion rights were met with opposition in other states. In Florida, a measure to protect the right to abortion until viability was expected to win a majority of votes but fell short of the 60 percent threshold required to pass. Previously a shelter for Southern patients seeking abortion care, Florida has recently implemented a six-week abortion restriction, thus cutting off access for many.
In South Dakota, a proposal to give a constitutional right to abortion during the first and second trimesters was likewise defeated. This would have restored abortion access, particularly for survivors of rape or incest, who have few options under existing restrictions.
Meanwhile, Nebraska had two competing proposals on the ballot. Voters supported a measure establishing a 12-week abortion ban with exceptions for rape, incest, and medical emergencies, but rejected a rival amendment that would have guaranteed the right to abortion until fetal viability. This was the first time in Nebraska history that two opposing proposals appeared on the same ballot, with intense campaigns on both sides accusing the other of misleading methods.
A broader context of state-level actions
Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, reproductive rights groups have advocated for state-level protections. So far, every popular vote aimed at safeguarding abortion access has passed, while attempts to limit it have failed. This year’s findings reveal a strong trend in certain states to strengthen abortion rights, but the road ahead is difficult for those with deeply conservative attitudes.
A look ahead
As the debate over reproductive rights continues, the results of these ballots provide a snapshot of the United States during a period of deep disagreement. While seven states took decisive steps to enhance or safeguard abortion rights, defeats in Florida and South Dakota highlight the challenges that activists now confront.
The conflicting results highlight the importance of state-level action in determining access to reproductive healthcare. As laws vary greatly, state-level measures are becoming increasingly important in the ongoing debate over reproductive rights, with votes reflecting the perspectives of communities on both sides of the issue.
Today’s spotlight in our “Best Of” roundup turns to Politics. These top solutions from 2024 remind us of the power of policy and governance to drive meaningful change and foster a more just and equitable society.
