Today’s Solutions: December 04, 2024

Recently a row broke out over the international program director working for Greenpeace in Amsterdam who several times a month flew to visit his family in Luxembourg. After the issue was raised in the media Greenpeace issued a statement saying that the director would take the train from now on. The argument: Flying is bad for the environment and green activists should take the train.

But is flying so bad? Researchers from the University of Michigan’s Transportation Research Institute have discovered that flying, depending on trip specifications is better for the environment than driving. The study authors looked at data sets pertaining to passenger movement in the last 40 years. They concluded that flying is 57% better for the environment than driving. It should be noted however that taking the train is even better for the environment.

Solutions News Source Print this article
More of Today's Solutions

HPV vaccination shows promise in reducing cervical cancer deaths among young ...

BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM Cervical cancer fatalities among young women in the United States have dropped dramatically, marking a significant public health ...

Read More

Why you need to place a bowl of salt by your window this winter

BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM When winter arrives, it's not just the snowy roads that make life difficult; your windows could be home ...

Read More

LA may ban the construction of new gas stations

In the face of the climate emergency, officials in Los Angeles are working on policies to stop the construction of new gas stations. Being ...

Read More

The Senate is on the verge of enacting new protections for pregnant workers

After 10 years of effort, the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), which would mandate reasonable workplace accommodations to allow pregnant workers to safely work, ...

Read More